What is Lamarck’s Theory?

• Lamarckism, proposed by Jean-Baptiste de Monet Lamarck, encompasses a range of theoretical positions on the nature of evolution. In the 18th to early 20th centuries, various explanations emerged, shedding light on the succession, history, and transformations of life forms. Lamarck’s theory stands in contrast to Darwin’s belief that individuals are born with random variations in traits. Instead, Lamarck suggested that traits can develop and change throughout an animal’s lifetime. According to Lamarckism, these acquired characteristics can be transmitted to future generations.
• Jean-Baptiste de Monet Lamarck, born in 1744, was a French biologist who formulated this theory. He proposed that all physical changes occurring in an individual during its lifetime are inherited by its offspring. For instance, the development of an organ through repeated use was considered a notable example of this theory. Lamarck’s theory was based on two key hypotheses: the development of traits through the use and disuse of body parts and the inheritance of acquired characteristics from parents to offspring.
• Lamarck introduced the concept that organisms tend to become more complex over time, progressing along a ladder of advancement. He referred to this phenomenon as “Le pouvoir de la vie” or “la force qui tend sans cesse à composer l’organisation” (The force that perpetually tends to make order). Lamarck also believed in the ongoing spontaneous generation of simple living organisms through the interaction of a material life force with physical matter.
• Although Lamarck is often associated with the theory of inheritance of acquired characteristics, referred to as soft inheritance or Lamarckism, he also explored the broader concept of evolution. He postulated that all living species, including humans, have descended from other species, and that the animal and plant kingdoms have evolved in an orderly and progressive manner.
• In introductory textbooks, Lamarckism is often contrasted with Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection. However, Darwin’s own work, such as his book “On the Origin of Species,” acknowledged the idea of heritable effects resulting from use and disuse, similar to Lamarck’s concept. Darwin’s theory also implied soft inheritance through his concept of pangenesis.
• Attempts to find evidence for Lamarckian inheritance were made by numerous researchers starting from the 1860s. However, these attempts have been explained away, either due to other mechanisms like genetic contamination or as instances of fraud. August Weismann’s experiment, once considered definitive, failed to disprove Lamarckism as it did not address the concept of use and disuse. The rise of Mendelian genetics ultimately displaced the notion of inheritance of acquired traits, leading to the development of the modern synthesis and the declining prominence of Lamarckism in biology. Nonetheless, interest in Lamarckism has persisted.
• Advancements in the fields of epigenetics, genetics, and somatic hypermutation have shed light on limited inheritance of traits acquired by the previous generation. However, the characterization of these findings as Lamarckism remains subject to dispute. Another aspect of inheritance with Lamarckian effects is the hologenome, which includes the genomes of an organism’s symbiotic microbes as well as its own genome. This phenomenon aligns with aspects of Lamarckism while adhering to Darwinian mechanisms.
• Lamarck’s theory highlighted the slow, continuous, and irreversible process of organic evolution. It was the first attempt to describe the process of organic evolution, made in 1809 by Lamarck himself. Lamarck’s observations of various organisms led him to postulate that acquired characteristics could be passed on to offspring. Over generations, these modifications became more pronounced, leading to the emergence of new species.
• Lamarckism, with its focus on the transmission of acquired characters, became known as the “theory of inheritance of acquired characters.” While Lamarck’s specific theories have largely been superseded, his contributions and impact on the development of evolutionary thought have made him a noteworthy figure in the history of biology.

Postulates of Lamarckism’s Theory

Lamarckism, formulated by Jean-Baptiste de Monet Lamarck, is based on four fundamental postulates that form the core of his evolutionary theory:

1. The Inner Urge of Organisms: Lamarck proposed that organisms have an innate drive to develop and grow in size. According to him, this development arises from an inner need for life, pushing organisms towards increased complexity and structural advancement.
2. New Needs Arise due to the Ever-Changing Environment: Lamarck recognized that the environment is not static but constantly changing. As the surroundings evolve, organisms are faced with new challenges and needs. They strive to adapt to their new habitat in order to survive. In response to the changing environment, organisms undergo structural alterations and behavioral changes to better suit their new conditions. Lamarck believed that organisms acquire adaptive characteristics to cope with the demands of their environment.
3. Use and Disuse of Organs: Lamarck proposed that when the environment changes, certain organs or appendages of an organism are used more frequently than others. The organs and appendages that are utilized more frequently tend to grow and develop more effectively, while those that are less used in the altered environment become vestigial or diminished. Lamarck believed that the use or disuse of organs could lead to their modification or disappearance over time.
4. Inheritance of Acquired Characters: Lamarck’s most famous postulate is the inheritance of acquired characteristics. He observed that organisms develop new adaptive characteristics in response to environmental changes during their lifetime. These acquired characteristics, which can be morphological, physiological, or behavioral, are not present in the preceding generation. Lamarck hypothesized that these acquired traits are passed on to future generations, resulting in evolutionary changes within a species.

Lamarck’s theory can be summarized by four main propositions:

1. Change through Use and Disuse: Lamarck argued that organs or traits used frequently by organisms would develop and be passed on to subsequent generations, while traits that are used infrequently would diminish over time.
2. Organisms Driven to Greater Complexity: Lamarck believed that organisms tend to become more complex as they adapt to their environment, evolving from simpler forms. He also held a belief in spontaneous generation of life.
3. Inheritance of Acquired Characters: Lamarck postulated that an individual’s acquired characteristics, acquired through the use or disuse of body parts or as a response to environmental changes, can be inherited by their offspring.
4. Effect of Environment and New Needs: Lamarck emphasized that organisms are influenced by their environment, and even minor changes in the environment can lead to changes in the organisms themselves. This, in turn, generates new needs, which drive the development of new structures and behaviors in organisms.

While Lamarckism has been largely superseded by modern evolutionary theory, it played a significant role in shaping early thinking on evolution. The postulates of Lamarckism provide insights into Lamarck’s perspective on how organisms evolve and adapt to their changing environments.

Examples of Lamarckism

Lamarck put forth several examples to support his theories on the inheritance of acquired characteristics. These examples aimed to illustrate how organisms adapt and evolve in response to their environment, leading to changes that are passed down through generations. Some notable examples of Lamarckism include:

1. Evolution of Giraffes: According to Lamarck, the ancestors of giraffes had short necks and forelimbs similar to horses. As these ancestors inhabited regions with sparse surface vegetation, they had to stretch their necks and forelimbs to reach leaves on tall plants. Over time, this elongation of body parts occurred and was inherited by subsequent generations, leading to the characteristic long necks of modern giraffes.
2. Aquatic Animals with Webbed Toes: Lamarck suggested that aquatic birds like ducks evolved from terrestrial species. The ancestors of these birds gradually developed webbed toes to adapt to their aquatic environment, enabling them to swim more efficiently.
3. Extinction of Limbs in Snakes: Snakes are believed to have descended from lizard-like ancestors that possessed two pairs of limbs. Lamarck proposed that as snakes adapted to a more serpentine lifestyle, their limbs gradually regressed and eventually became vestigial due to disuse.
4. Flightless Birds: Lamarck theorized that flightless birds, such as ostriches, descended from flying ancestors. These birds inhabited environments where they had an abundance of food and were well-sheltered, which led to a diminished need for flight. Over time, their wings became less developed and eventually lost the ability to fly.
5. Dwellers in Caves: Lamarck suggested that cave-dwelling animals, like certain species of fish and insects, originated from ancestors with well-developed eyesight. As these organisms adapted to living in constant darkness, their eyes gradually regressed and became non-functional due to the lack of visual stimuli.
6. Flatfish: Lamarck observed that deep-sea fishes, like flatfish, live on the ocean floor where sunlight is scarce. To adapt to this environment, the eye on one side of their body migrates to the upper side, allowing both eyes to focus on a single side. This adaptation is believed to have occurred over generations in response to the need for improved vision in a specific direction.
7. Whales: Lamarck proposed that whales lost their hind limbs as a hereditary consequence of disuse. As whales adapted to an aquatic lifestyle, their hind limbs became functionless and eventually disappeared over time through the process of inheritance.

These examples provided by Lamarck aimed to demonstrate his theory that acquired characteristics can be inherited and lead to evolutionary changes in subsequent generations. However, it is important to note that these examples have been largely discredited by modern evolutionary biology, which emphasizes the role of genetic variation and natural selection in driving evolutionary change.

Parts of Lamarck’s Theory

Lamarck’s theory can be divided into two key parts, each highlighting different aspects of evolutionary change:

1. Emergence of New Structures: According to Lamarck, new structures in organisms emerge as a result of their intrinsic desire for development. He proposed that organisms possess an innate drive or inner desire to grow and advance. This intrinsic desire leads to the appearance of new structures and characteristics in organisms over time. Lamarck believed that this drive for growth is an inherent feature of life itself.
2. Acquired Characteristics and Inheritance: Lamarck argued that the acquisition of new structures by organisms is a response to their needs and challenges in the environment. As organisms interact with their environment, they develop new traits or modify existing ones to better adapt to their circumstances. These acquired characteristics are then passed on to future generations through the process of inheritance. Lamarck believed that the modifications or improvements acquired during an organism’s lifetime would be transmitted to its offspring, leading to evolutionary change in the species over successive generations.

To support his ideas, Lamarck presented various examples from different groups of animals. Two famous instances that he cited are:

1. The Giraffe’s Neck: Lamarck used the example of the giraffe to illustrate his theory. He suggested that the ancestors of giraffes had relatively shorter necks and forelimbs, but they encountered an environment with high-growing foliage. As a response to the need to reach higher leaves for food, Lamarck proposed that giraffes stretched their necks over generations. The continuous stretching resulted in the elongation of the neck, and this acquired characteristic was then inherited by subsequent generations of giraffes.
2. The Mole’s Front Limbs: Lamarck also cited the example of moles to support his theory. He observed that moles live underground and rely heavily on their front limbs for digging and burrowing. According to Lamarck, the frequent use and development of the front limbs in moles led to their increased size and strength over time. Lamarck suggested that these acquired characteristics of robust front limbs were inherited by successive generations of moles.

These examples served as evidence for Lamarck’s theory, illustrating how organisms could develop new structures and pass them on to future generations through the process of inheritance. While Lamarck’s theory has been largely superseded by modern evolutionary understanding, his ideas and observations contributed to the early development of evolutionary thought and understanding of the mechanisms of change in organisms over time.

Evidence to prove or support Lamarckism

Criticism of Lamarck’s Theory

Lamarck’s theory of evolution faced significant criticism from other scientists and evolutionists. Several objections were raised against Lamarckism, challenging its validity and undermining its core principles. The criticism can be summarized as follows:

1. Tendency to Increase in Size: Lamarck’s first law, proposing that all organisms tend to grow in size, was met with skepticism. Critics pointed out numerous examples that contradicted this law. For instance, some poriferans (sponges) are larger than coelenterates (jellyfish and corals), and many fish are larger than amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. These observations undermined the idea of a universal tendency for organisms to increase in size.
2. Inheritance of Acquired Characters: August Weismann conducted experiments to challenge Lamarck’s hypothesis regarding the inheritance of acquired characteristics. Weismann repeatedly removed the tails of rats for approximately 22 generations and allowed them to reproduce. He found that there was never a rat born without a tail in any generation. Weismann concluded that only traits affecting germ cells (reproductive cells) are inherited, while alterations in somatic cells (body cells) are not passed on to the next generation. This countered Lamarck’s notion of acquired traits being inherited and supported the “theory of germplasm.”
3. Use and Disuse of Organs: Lamarck’s theory proposed that the use or disuse of organs could lead to changes in their size and musculature, which would be inherited by future generations. However, critics rejected this idea since there was no evidence of organs, such as the heart or eye, showing changes in size or musculature due to their constant use.
4. Formation of New Organs at Will: Critics argued that if Lamarck’s concept of new organs developing in response to an organism’s need and inner urge were valid, humans who have always desired to fly would have evolved wings by now. The absence of such changes contradicted Lamarck’s hypothesis.
5. Linear Evolution: Lamarck’s theory proposed a linear form of evolution, implying that species would evolve predictably and steadily, potentially leading to extinction. However, critics argued that evolution is a complex and dynamic process, involving branching patterns, adaptation to changing environments, and various factors that contribute to the diversification of species.

Other prominent critics of Lamarck’s theory included scientists such as Georges Cuvier and August Weismann. Their objections, along with the emerging understanding of Mendelian genetics and the laws of inheritance discovered by Gregor Mendel, further undermined Lamarckism. Mendel’s laws of inheritance demonstrated that the transmission of traits occurs through discrete units (genes) and does not support the inheritance of acquired characteristics proposed by Lamarck.

As a result of these criticisms and the advancements in understanding genetics and evolution, Lamarck’s theory gradually lost support and was eventually supplanted by the modern synthesis of evolutionary biology, which integrated natural selection and Mendelian genetics. Nonetheless, Lamarck’s contributions to the early development of evolutionary thought and the understanding of species’ adaptations and transformations are acknowledged, even though his specific mechanisms of evolution have been largely discarded.

Neo-Lamarckism

• Despite the extensive criticism of Lamarck’s original theory of evolution, a group of followers attempted to revive and refine his ideas, giving rise to what is known as Neo-Lamarckism. Neo-Lamarckism represents an improved version of Lamarck’s theory, addressing some of the concerns raised by critics.
• While the direct transmission of acquired characteristics through use and disuse had not been demonstrated, Neo-Lamarckism acknowledged the potential for such transmission. Neo-Lamarckians conducted various studies and experiments in an effort to provide evidence for the inheritance of acquired characteristics. For example, Griffith and Detleoson conducted an experiment with rats raised on a revolving table for several months. These rats became so accustomed to the rotation that when the table was suddenly stopped, they experienced dizziness and physiological changes. When these rats bred among themselves, their offspring also exhibited dizziness when the spinning motion was halted. Similarly, Guyer and Smith performed an experiment involving a rabbit lens inserted into a fowl to produce antibodies. The resulting fowl antiserum was then injected into a pregnant rabbit, leading to some of the offspring having damaged eyes. This particular trait was observed to be passed down through multiple generations.
• Some proponents of Neo-Lamarckism, such as T.H. Morgan and Cope, proposed that if acquired changes were integrated with the germplasm (reproductive cells), they could be heritable. According to their hypothesis, the accumulation of these changes over successive generations could eventually lead to the emergence of new species.
• Neo-Lamarckism emphasized the direct influence of changing environments on organisms and recognized that only alterations affecting germ cells would be passed on to the next generation. This distinction aimed to address the limitations of Lamarck’s original theory and provide a more refined understanding of the inheritance of acquired characteristics.
• While Neo-Lamarckism sought to address some of the criticisms of Lamarck’s theory, it still faced significant challenges and ultimately did not gain widespread acceptance. With the advancements in genetics and the understanding of inheritance through Mendelian principles, Neo-Lamarckism gradually lost support and was largely superseded by the modern synthesis of evolutionary biology, which integrated Darwinian natural selection and Mendelian genetics.
• Nevertheless, despite the ultimate rejection of Lamarckism and its Neo-Lamarckian revisions, Lamarck deserves recognition for being the first to develop a comprehensive theory of evolution. His contributions laid the foundation for future scientific inquiry and paved the way for the development of modern evolutionary thought.

What are the Evidence to prove or support Lamarckism?

Lamarck’s theory of evolution, although largely discredited, proposed that acquired characteristics can be inherited and lead to evolutionary changes in subsequent generations. While Lamarckism lacks robust evidence compared to modern evolutionary theories like Darwin’s theory of natural selection, proponents of Lamarckism have put forth some examples to support their arguments. These examples are:

1. Long-Necked Giraffe: According to Lamarckism, the evolution of the long-necked giraffe occurred through the continuous stretching of neck muscles in order to access food from tall trees. Initially, the ancestors of giraffes had short necks and primarily fed on grasses. However, as the grass supply decreased, they had to adapt by reaching higher leaves on trees. The continuous stretching of the neck over generations resulted in the development of longer necks, which were then transmitted to offspring.
2. Loss of Limbs in Snakes: Lamarckism suggests that snakes lost their limbs due to the continuous disuse of them as they adapted to a life of creeping through holes and crevices. The limbs were hindrances in their burrowing activities, and over time, through successive generations, the snakes’ limbs regressed and eventually disappeared.
3. Vestigial Organs: The presence of vestigial organs in humans and other animals is often cited as evidence supporting Lamarckism. Vestigial organs are remnants of organs that were functional in ancestral species but have lost their original purpose over evolutionary time. Examples include the human appendix and the pelvic bones in whales, which no longer serve a significant function. Lamarckists argue that these vestigial organs result from disuse and the inheritance of traits acquired by earlier generations.
4. Webbed Hind Limbs in Frogs and Ducks: Lamarckism proposes that the development of webbing on the hind limbs of frogs and ducks, which aids in swimming, is the result of continuous use of those limbs for locomotion and foraging in water. According to this view, the increased use of the hind limbs led to the development of webbed toes, which were then inherited by subsequent generations.

While these examples are used to support Lamarckism, it’s important to note that modern evolutionary biology overwhelmingly supports Darwin’s theory of natural selection, which emphasizes genetic variation, heredity, and differential reproductive success as the primary drivers of evolutionary change. Lamarckism lacks substantial empirical evidence and is not widely accepted among the scientific community as a comprehensive explanation for the mechanisms of evolution.

Experiments in support of Lamarck

Despite the criticisms and challenges faced by Lamarckism, there have been some experiments conducted in the past that were interpreted as supporting the idea of the inheritance of acquired characteristics. While these experiments were initially considered as evidence for Lamarckism, subsequent scrutiny and further research have cast doubt on their validity. Here are some examples of such experiments:

1. Experiments by F.B. Sumner: F.B. Sumner conducted experiments with white mice, rearing one set in warmer temperatures and another set in cold conditions. He observed that mice raised in warmer temperatures developed larger ears and longer tails. Sumner claimed that these acquired traits were inherited by subsequent generations. However, it is important to note that this experiment lacked rigorous control and replication, and subsequent studies have failed to reproduce similar results.
2. Experiments by McDougall: McDougall conducted experiments on rats to investigate the inheritance of acquired learning. He used a maze with two exits, one well-lit but with an electrical shock at the end, and the other dark with a piece of cheese as a reward. Rats that chose the dark pathway and received the cheese were allowed to breed. McDougall claimed that the next generation of rats showed an improved ability to learn the correct pathway. However, the experimental design and methodology of McDougall’s work were criticized, and subsequent attempts to replicate the findings yielded inconsistent results.
3. Experiments by Lindsey: Lindsey conducted experiments on various animals, both cold-blooded and warm-blooded, as well as plants, subjecting them to unusual conditions. He observed that some changes induced by these conditions were transmitted to some extent in the offspring. However, the specific details and outcomes of Lindsey’s experiments are not widely known or accepted, and further research in this area has not substantiated his claims.
4. Experiments by Griffith and Detlefson: Griffith and Detlefson conducted an experiment with rats placed on rotating tables for several months. The rats became adapted to the rotating conditions to such an extent that when the rotation was stopped, they exhibited signs of dizziness. This condition was claimed to have been inherited for several generations. However, like the other experiments mentioned, the methods and results of this study have been questioned and have not been consistently replicated.

It is important to note that while these experiments were initially seen as supportive of Lamarckism, subsequent scrutiny and advancements in scientific understanding have revealed flaws in their design, methodology, and interpretations. The consensus in modern evolutionary biology leans towards the principles of natural selection and genetic inheritance as the primary drivers of evolutionary change, rather than the inheritance of acquired characteristics proposed by Lamarck.

Importance of Lamarckism

• Lamarckism, despite its shortcomings and subsequent criticism, holds historical significance as the first comprehensive theory of evolution. Jean-Baptiste Lamarck’s study of fossils and living organisms led him to propose his four postulates, laying the foundation for evolutionary thought. While Lamarckism has been refined and expanded upon over time, it played a crucial role in shaping subsequent evolutionary theories, including Darwinism.
• Darwinism, or Darwin’s theory of natural selection, builds upon some of the ideas presented by Lamarckism, although with important differences. Both theories recognize the influence of the natural environment on the development and adaptation of organisms. Lamarckism emphasizes the role of acquired characteristics, while Darwinism focuses on variation and differential reproductive success as the driving forces of evolution. However, the fundamental importance of nature and its impact on species is a common thread in both theories.
• Lamarckism’s influence extends beyond its direct application. The study and analysis of Lamarckian ideas have contributed to the development of the Synthesis Theory, which combines elements of both Darwinism and genetics. This theory seeks to integrate the understanding of evolutionary mechanisms and genetic inheritance, providing a more comprehensive framework for understanding the complexities of evolution.
• While there are numerous examples that challenge Lamarckism and support alternative theories, it is important to note that there are also examples that appear to align with Lamarckian principles. These supportive examples help address certain evolutionary questions and contribute to our understanding of how organisms adapt and change over time.
• Furthermore, Lamarckism has the advantage of simplicity compared to Darwinism. Its straightforward explanation of the inheritance of acquired characteristics appeals to many scientists, as it offers an intuitive understanding of how organisms can adapt to their environment and pass on those adaptations to future generations.
• In summary, the importance of Lamarckism lies in its historical significance as the first comprehensive theory of evolution and its role in shaping subsequent evolutionary thought. While it may have limitations and face criticism, Lamarckism has contributed to the development of other evolutionary theories, stimulated scientific inquiry, and provided insights into the mechanisms of evolutionary change.

Drawbacks in Lamarckism

While Lamarckism played a significant role in the development of evolutionary thought, it has several drawbacks that have led to its criticism and the emergence of alternative theories. Some of the key drawbacks in Lamarckism are as follows:

1. Lack of Experimental Evidence: One of the major criticisms against Lamarckism is the absence of experimental evidence to support its claims. Lamarck’s theory heavily relied on observational and anecdotal evidence, rather than rigorous experimental verification. The lack of empirical studies demonstrating the transmission of acquired characteristics to subsequent generations has weakened the credibility of Lamarckism.
2. Wishful Formation of Organs: Lamarckism proposes that new organs can develop in organisms based on their desires or needs. However, there is no scientific basis or evidence to support this claim. The notion that organisms can consciously generate new organs to adapt to their environment lacks empirical support and contradicts our understanding of the biological processes involved in the development of new structures.
3. Inheritance of Acquired Characters: According to Lamarckism, acquired characteristics during an organism’s lifetime can be passed on to the next generation. However, this idea has been heavily criticized and contradicted by subsequent scientific findings. August Weismann’s experiments, such as tail removal in mice for multiple generations, demonstrated that somatic alterations acquired during an individual’s lifetime do not affect the germ cells and, therefore, cannot be inherited by offspring. This refutation weakened the notion of the inheritance of acquired characters, a key tenet of Lamarckism.
4. Lack of Mechanistic Explanation: Lamarckism lacks a detailed mechanistic explanation for how acquired characteristics are transmitted and integrated into an organism’s hereditary material. The theory does not provide a clear understanding of the molecular and genetic mechanisms involved in the transmission of acquired traits to subsequent generations, which limits its explanatory power.

In conclusion, Lamarckism has several drawbacks that have led to its diminished acceptance in modern evolutionary biology. The lack of experimental evidence, the unsupported idea of wishful organ formation, and the failure to demonstrate the inheritance of acquired characters have weakened the credibility of Lamarckism as a comprehensive evolutionary theory. However, its historical significance should not be overlooked, as it paved the way for subsequent theories and contributed to the development of our understanding of evolution.

FAQ